Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

The classification of congenital malformations has been transformed over recent decades by advances in genetic analysis, so that the natural history of many disorders during childhood is well described. However, implications for adult prognosis and survival are often poorly documented. In Apert syndrome, caused by heterozygous germline mutations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor type 2 gene (FGFR2), the question of prognosis is particularly pertinent because FGFR2 is a known cancer driver gene (oncogene) and the identical mutations, when arising somatically, are enriched in specific tumours, notably endometrial carcinoma. We exploited a unique resource provided by a series of 24 UK patients described by Dr Eric Blank in 1960, and used tracing of cancer events and deaths through the National Health Service Central Register to determine the long-term outcome of these individuals until 2013, a period spanning 53 years. Twelve individuals (50%) were still alive and without any cancer registration, at the end of the study; of the remainder, two could not be traced and ten were known to have died, with four deaths related to malignancies. We conclude that Apert syndrome is not, in many affected individuals, associated either with substantial shortening of lifespan, or with a high risk of developing particular types of cancer. Explanation of the lack of strong cancer predisposition, despite the oncogenic nature of the FGFR2 mutations, may lie in the different signalling relationship that a mutant cell has with its neighbours when the mutation is present constitutionally, compared to occurrence as a somatic change.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1038/s41431-026-02122-w

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2026-05-04T00:00:00+00:00