Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Cathepsin D is a widely expressed aspartyl lysosomal protease. Clinical studies in several tumor types have shown a strong correlation between cathepsin D expression and tumor progression. In breast carcinoma, its expression is an independent prognostic factor associated with an increased risk of death. However, there have been no studies evaluating cathepsin D in bladder tumors. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the pattern of expression of cathepsin D in a large series of bladder carcinomas and assess its role as a prognostic factor against established variables. The tumors from 105 patients (median age 73) (median follow-up 26 months) with transitional cell carcinoma of bladder were examined. Forty-nine patients had superficial tumors (16 pTa; 33 pT1), 56 had invasive tumors (14 pT2; 42 pT3); there were 35 grade 1/2 tumors and 70 grade 3 tumors. These were stained by a standard immunohistochemical technique with an anti-cathepsin D monoclonal antibody. All 4 normal bladder specimens were positive for cathepsin D. Fifty-four tumors (51 percent) were positive for cathepsin D and 51 (49 percent) were negative. Chi square analysis showed a significant positive relationship between negative cathepsin D expression and stage (p less than 0.0005), grade (p less than 0.0001) and tumor morphology (p = 0.001). There was no relationship between cathepsin D expression and tumor ploidy (p greater than 0.1) or patient age (p = 0.09). Univariate analysis of disease-free and overall survival showed that negative cathepsin D expression (p = 0.01 and p = 0.0003 respectively), stage (p = 0.004 and p less than 0.005 respectively) and grade (p = 0.02 and p = 0.0007 respectively) were associated with significantly worse prognosis. However, in a multivariate analysis of age, stage, grade and cathepsin D expression, only stage remained significant for overall survival (p less than 0.005). The observed result for cathepsin D in the univariate analysis is probably due to its strong association with grade and stage. Nevertheless, cathepsin D status was able to provide additional prognostic information for overall survival in invasive tumors when stratifying for grade (p = 0.047), which suggests that it might provide additional prognostic data within particular tumor stages. © 1995 American Urological Association, Inc.

Original publication

DOI

10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67286-0

Type

Journal article

Journal

The Journal of Urology

Publication Date

01/01/1995

Volume

154

Pages

237 - 241